Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757457Ab3JRWhR (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Oct 2013 18:37:17 -0400 Received: from co9ehsobe005.messaging.microsoft.com ([207.46.163.28]:34848 "EHLO co9outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757226Ab3JRWhP (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Oct 2013 18:37:15 -0400 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:70.37.183.190;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:mail.freescale.net;RD:none;EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -4 X-BigFish: VS-4(zz98dI936eI154dI1432Izz1f42h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzz1de098h1de097h8275bhz2dh2a8h839h93fhd24hf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah139eh13b6h1441h1504h1537h162dh1631h1758h1898h18e1h1946h19b5h1ad9h1b0ah1b2fh1fb3h1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1dfeh1dffh1e23h1fe8h1ff5h1155h) Message-ID: <1382135824.7979.906.camel@snotra.buserror.net> Subject: Re: [v5][PATCH 1/6] powerpc/book3e: load critical/machine/debug exception stack From: Scott Wood To: Tiejun Chen CC: , , Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 17:37:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1371724110-8250-2-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@windriver.com> References: <1371724110-8250-1-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@windriver.com> <1371724110-8250-2-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@windriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4-0ubuntu1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginatorOrg: freescale.com X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn% Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3164 Lines: 88 On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 18:28 +0800, Tiejun Chen wrote: > We always alloc critical/machine/debug check exceptions. This is > different from the normal exception. So we should load these exception > stack properly like we did for booke. This is "booke". Do you mean like "like we did for 32-bit"? And the code is already trying to load the special stack; it just happens that it's loading from a different location than the C code placed the stack addresses. The changelog should point out the specific thing that is being fixed. > Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen > --- > arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64e.S | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64e.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64e.S > index 4b23119..4d8e57f 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64e.S > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64e.S > @@ -36,6 +36,37 @@ > */ > #define SPECIAL_EXC_FRAME_SIZE INT_FRAME_SIZE > > +/* only on book3e */ > +#define DBG_STACK_BASE dbgirq_ctx > +#define MC_STACK_BASE mcheckirq_ctx > +#define CRIT_STACK_BASE critirq_ctx > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_RELOCATABLE > +#define LOAD_STACK_BASE(reg, level) \ > + tovirt(r2,r2); \ > + LOAD_REG_ADDR(reg, level##_STACK_BASE); > +#else > +#define LOAD_STACK_BASE(reg, level) \ > + LOAD_REG_IMMEDIATE(reg, level##_STACK_BASE); > +#endif > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP > +#define BOOK3E_LOAD_EXC_LEVEL_STACK(level) \ > + mfspr r14,SPRN_PIR; \ > + slwi r14,r14,3; \ > + LOAD_STACK_BASE(r10, level); \ > + add r10,r10,r14; \ > + ld r10,0(r10); \ > + addi r10,r10,THREAD_SIZE; \ > + std r10,PACA_##level##_STACK(r13); > +#else > +#define BOOK3E_LOAD_EXC_LEVEL_STACK(level) \ > + LOAD_STACK_BASE(r10, level); \ > + ld r10,0(r10); \ > + addi r10,r10,THREAD_SIZE; \ > + std r10,PACA_##level##_STACK(r13); > +#endif It looks like you're loading the stack from *irq_ctx, storing it in PACA_*_stack, and then (immediately after this in the caller) loading it back from PACA_*_STACK. Why not just load it from *irq_ctx and get rid of PACA_*_STACK altogether -- or change the C code to initialize the addresses in the PACA instead, and get ird of *irq_ctx on 64-bit? > /* Exception prolog code for all exceptions */ > #define EXCEPTION_PROLOG(n, intnum, type, addition) \ > mtspr SPRN_SPRG_##type##_SCRATCH,r13; /* get spare registers */ \ > @@ -68,20 +99,32 @@ > #define SPRN_GDBELL_SRR1 SPRN_GSRR1 > > #define CRIT_SET_KSTACK \ > + andi. r10,r11,MSR_PR; \ > + bne 1f; \ > + BOOK3E_LOAD_EXC_LEVEL_STACK(CRIT); \ > ld r1,PACA_CRIT_STACK(r13); \ > - subi r1,r1,SPECIAL_EXC_FRAME_SIZE; > + subi r1,r1,SPECIAL_EXC_FRAME_SIZE; \ The caller will already check MSR_PR and override this if coming from userspace; why do you need to check again here? -Scott -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/