Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753275Ab3JSWCl (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Oct 2013 18:02:41 -0400 Received: from cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com ([107.14.166.225]:51772 "EHLO cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751481Ab3JSWCk (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Oct 2013 18:02:40 -0400 Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 18:02:39 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Masami Hiramatsu , Petr Mladek , Frederic Weisbecker , Jiri Kosina , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] x86: allow to call text_poke_bp during boot Message-ID: <20131019180239.1e318628@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20131019213350.GH4118@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1382106445-31468-3-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.cz> <52629F08.2010609@hitachi.com> <20131019151658.583ac18e@gandalf.local.home> <20131019151919.2d4778d2@gandalf.local.home> <20131019213350.GH4118@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.142:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1146 Lines: 35 On Sat, 19 Oct 2013 14:33:50 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" wrote: > > > It's used to convert the calls to mcount to nops. But maybe a better > > > thing to do is to check if we only have a single CPU: > > > > > > static void run_sync(void) > > > { > > > if (num_online_cpus() != 1) > > > > Hmm, to be more robust to handle our future "ideal" machines, perhaps > > this should be: > > > > /* Ideally we would like to run on zero CPUS! */ > > if (num_online_cpus() < 2) > Bah! And for such a simple computation, I got it wrong. /* Ideally we would like to run on zero CPUS! */ if (num_online_cpus > 1) But I guess the question comes. If we are running on zero CPUS, should we perform the "on_each_cpu(do_sync_core, NULL, 1);" or not? Same goes with 5i-3 CPUS, or negative number CPUs. If we need to do on_each_cpu(), then I guess the != 1 will suffice. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/