Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:14:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:14:55 -0400 Received: from e4.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.104]:45512 "EHLO e4.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:14:54 -0400 Subject: Re: writepage return value check in vmscan.c From: Paul Larson To: Andrew Morton Cc: chrisl@vmware.com, Andrea Arcangeli , lkml , chrisl@gnuchina.org, Alan Cox In-Reply-To: <3DB86650.1C48F044@digeo.com> References: <20021024082505.GB1471@vmware.com> <3DB7B11B.9E552CFF@digeo.com> <20021024175718.GA1398@vmware.com> <20021024183327.GS3354@dualathlon.random> <20021024191531.GD1398@vmware.com> <3DB85C1B.62D14184@digeo.com> <20021024212313.GF1398@vmware.com> <3DB86650.1C48F044@digeo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.5 Date: 25 Oct 2002 11:11:41 -0500 Message-Id: <1035562304.5646.171.camel@plars> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 637 Lines: 16 On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 16:29, Andrew Morton wrote: > -ac kernels have an lru per zone and so would not be bitten > by this failure. If indeed you are striking this problem, > which is described at > http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-mm/2002-08/msg00049.html Is it the 2.4 or 2.5 (or both) ac kernels that have the per zone lru? I have some stuff I'd like to try with that. Thanks, Paul Larson - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/