Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751450Ab3JTLlf (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Oct 2013 07:41:35 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f175.google.com ([74.125.82.175]:34576 "EHLO mail-we0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751262Ab3JTLle (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Oct 2013 07:41:34 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20131020102203.GB77546@vega.codepro.be> References: <20131020102203.GB77546@vega.codepro.be> Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 19:41:32 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC] Rollback FS From: jiaweiwei To: Kristof Provost Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Harry Wei Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1035 Lines: 29 On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Kristof Provost wrote: > On 2013-10-20 15:06:33 (+0800), jiaweiwei wrote: >> We could implement a File System to record all the operations which >> send to VFS. Then when you think you have done a mistake command, you >> could rollback from this File System. >> >> This is just a RFC, I would give detail implementations. Would anyone >> please give me some suggestions? Thanks very much. > > I think it needs to be fleshed out a lot more. Yeah, I think so. > > For example, how would you tell it to roll back without a functional > libc? How does it differ from the snapshot feature in btrfs? I have not got detail implementation. I would give it and then we could talk with it. Thanks. -- do kernel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/