Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751507Ab3JTMf2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Oct 2013 08:35:28 -0400 Received: from imap.thunk.org ([74.207.234.97]:48187 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751305Ab3JTMf1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Oct 2013 08:35:27 -0400 Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 08:35:21 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: jiaweiwei Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Harry Wei Subject: Re: [RFC] Rollback FS Message-ID: <20131020123521.GA15627@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Ts'o , jiaweiwei , Vyacheslav Dubeyko , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Harry Wei References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on imap.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 703 Lines: 21 On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 07:37:01PM +0800, jiaweiwei wrote: > > Any file system should rollback but not specific ones. Therefore, a > VFS like mechanism should be designed and implemented. And what if the blocks or inodes used for the files that were deleted have already been used and overwritten? > Maybe, I would give detail design, thanks. I encourage you to try to do that; you might find it to be an educational exercise. Best regards, - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/