Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751439Ab3JTQXe (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:23:34 -0400 Received: from mail.active-venture.com ([67.228.131.205]:59658 "EHLO mail.active-venture.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751293Ab3JTQXb (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:23:31 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 108.223.40.66 Message-ID: <52640379.8070609@roeck-us.net> Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 09:23:21 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ben Hutchings CC: Geert Uytterhoeven , Greg Ungerer , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , stable , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Linux/m68k Subject: Re: [000/121] 3.2.51-rc1 review References: <522C22DB.9080008@roeck-us.net> <522CAB38.2010909@roeck-us.net> <1382270174.2794.96.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <1382270174.2794.96.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1516 Lines: 39 On 10/20/2013 04:56 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sun, 2013-09-08 at 09:52 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On 09/08/2013 01:18 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >>> On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>>> m68k-linux-ld: error: no memory region specified for loadable section >>>> `.note.gnu.build-id' >>> >>> I can't seem to find an explicit fix for that since v3.2. >>> Perhaps the fix is a side effect of f84f52a5c15db7d14a534815f27253b001735183 >>> ("m68knommu: clean up linker script"). >>> >> >> Kind of. Turns out it requires the following patches. >> >> 40c1b9cf (m68k: consolidate the vmlinux.lds linker scripts) >> ed865e31 (m68k: use non-MMU linker script for ColdFire MMU builds) >> f84f52a5 (m68knommu: clean up linker script) >> >> With those patches applied, all my m68k builds (mmu and nommu) pass with 3.2. > > I've queued these up for 3.2. The first looks quite a big change in > terms of lines, but most of that is just renaming a file so I think it's > within the spirit of the stable rules. The third is also pretty big as > m68knommu seems so broken in 3.2 that I suppose it is OK. > > Ben. > Hi Ben, is that in your patch list yet ? Just wondering, because the latest nommu build still failed. Thanks, Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/