Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:51:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:51:13 -0400 Received: from 1-116.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br ([200.181.137.116]:43191 "EHLO 1-116.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:51:12 -0400 Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:57:09 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: James Cleverdon cc: Andrea Arcangeli , Andrew Morton , Subject: Re: Kswapd madness in 2.4 kernels In-Reply-To: <200210242026.13071.jamesclv@us.ibm.com> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-ID: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 920 Lines: 24 On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, James Cleverdon wrote: > We have some customers with some fairly beefy servers. They can get the > system into an unusable state that has been reported on lkml before. > The two attached patches applied to 2.4.19 fix the problem on our test boxes. > > Are these patches still considered a good idea for 2.4? Is there something > better I should be using? Yes, these patches are a good idea. I'm curious why they haven't been submitted to Marcelo yet ;) Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Current spamtrap: october@surriel.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/