Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755010Ab3JUI7r (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Oct 2013 04:59:47 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:39855 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754517Ab3JUIxR (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Oct 2013 04:53:17 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "Ingo Molnar" , "Stephane Eranian" , "Peter Zijlstra" Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:46:28 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) Subject: [PATCH 3.2 132/149] perf: Clarify perf_cpu_context::active_pmu usage by renaming it to ::unique_pmu In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 212.20.242.100 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2931 Lines: 92 3.2.52-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Peter Zijlstra commit 3f1f33206c16c7b3839d71372bc2ac3f305aa802 upstream. Stephane thought the perf_cpu_context::active_pmu name confusing and suggested using 'unique_pmu' instead. This pointer is a pointer to a 'random' pmu sharing the cpuctx instance, therefore limiting a for_each_pmu loop to those where cpuctx->unique_pmu matches the pmu we get a loop over unique cpuctx instances. Suggested-by: Stephane Eranian Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-kxyjqpfj2fn9gt7kwu5ag9ks@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- include/linux/perf_event.h | 2 +- kernel/events/core.c | 12 ++++++------ 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h @@ -927,7 +927,7 @@ struct perf_cpu_context { int exclusive; struct list_head rotation_list; int jiffies_interval; - struct pmu *active_pmu; + struct pmu *unique_pmu; struct perf_cgroup *cgrp; }; --- a/kernel/events/core.c +++ b/kernel/events/core.c @@ -4381,7 +4381,7 @@ static void perf_event_task_event(struct rcu_read_lock(); list_for_each_entry_rcu(pmu, &pmus, entry) { cpuctx = get_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_cpu_context); - if (cpuctx->active_pmu != pmu) + if (cpuctx->unique_pmu != pmu) goto next; perf_event_task_ctx(&cpuctx->ctx, task_event); @@ -4527,7 +4527,7 @@ static void perf_event_comm_event(struct rcu_read_lock(); list_for_each_entry_rcu(pmu, &pmus, entry) { cpuctx = get_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_cpu_context); - if (cpuctx->active_pmu != pmu) + if (cpuctx->unique_pmu != pmu) goto next; perf_event_comm_ctx(&cpuctx->ctx, comm_event); @@ -4723,7 +4723,7 @@ got_name: rcu_read_lock(); list_for_each_entry_rcu(pmu, &pmus, entry) { cpuctx = get_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_cpu_context); - if (cpuctx->active_pmu != pmu) + if (cpuctx->unique_pmu != pmu) goto next; perf_event_mmap_ctx(&cpuctx->ctx, mmap_event, vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC); @@ -5745,8 +5745,8 @@ static void update_pmu_context(struct pm cpuctx = per_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_cpu_context, cpu); - if (cpuctx->active_pmu == old_pmu) - cpuctx->active_pmu = pmu; + if (cpuctx->unique_pmu == old_pmu) + cpuctx->unique_pmu = pmu; } } @@ -5881,7 +5881,7 @@ skip_type: cpuctx->ctx.pmu = pmu; cpuctx->jiffies_interval = 1; INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cpuctx->rotation_list); - cpuctx->active_pmu = pmu; + cpuctx->unique_pmu = pmu; } got_cpu_context: -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/