Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:27:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:27:17 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-039-129.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.39.129]:39337 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:27:17 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Andrew Morton , lkml , linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: 2.5.44-mm5 Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 20:34:21 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] References: <3DB8D94B.20D3D5BD@digeo.com> In-Reply-To: <3DB8D94B.20D3D5BD@digeo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 847 Lines: 21 On Friday 25 October 2002 07:40, Andrew Morton wrote: > url: http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/2.5/2.5.44/2.5.44-mm5/ > > We seem to have found the dud patch. Things should be a little > more stable... > > The CONFIG_PREEMPT+SMP problem I was having went away when gcc-2.95.3 > was used in place of 2.91.66. Which is a bit of a problem because > _someone_ has to keep an eye on 2.91.66 compatibility as long as it > continues to be required for sparc builds. Didn't davem say something about being ready to move to a more recent compiler, or does my memory not serve correctly? -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/