Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:35:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:35:35 -0400 Received: from cpe-66-1-218-52.fl.sprintbbd.net ([66.1.218.52]:4875 "EHLO daytona.compro.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:35:34 -0400 Message-ID: <3DB9AD6D.C96A5398@compro.net> Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:45:33 -0400 From: Mark Hounschell Reply-To: markh@compro.net Organization: Compro Computer Svcs. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18-lcrs i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: root@chaos.analogic.com CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OT]AMD/Intel interrupt latency (jitter) differences? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1810 Lines: 45 "Richard B. Johnson" wrote: > > [SNIPPED....] > Please use the [Enter] key. Lines should have "\n" and not auto-wrap > in your mailer. Sorry... > > If you are measuring the interrupt latency jitter, you > must disconnect your Ethernet wire if you have a Bus Mastering > (read PCI) Ethernet board. You also have to make sure that > no other Bus Masters are able to run during the measurements. > > This is because the Bus Masters will keep the CPU(s) off the bus > for variable lengths of time as they transfer variable lengths > of data. This gives you the jitter. > > Even though you may not have any connections to your machine, > M$ on LANs generate much broadcast traffic that your network > software has to read, then drop on the floor. > > What this means, frankly, is that if interrupt latency is > in your specification, you can't use any Bus Mastering devices. > It's just that simple. > That makes sense. But, both these Intel and AMD boxes have pretty much the same config as far as pci cards and pci busses. They both have 1 or 2 66mhz and a 33 mhz bus. The Intel box used right now is a Super-micro p4dc6+ and only has our 2 33mhz cards in it. It has on board UW-scsi-2 controller using a 66MHz bus where as the AMD has no controllers on the 66mhz bus. It is using the onboard IDE controller. The intel has built in network card that IS active when running the emulation and the AMD has a 3c905 card that is also active. Other than that they are the same. I thought all recent pci cards were bus mastering capable these days?? Regards Mark - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/