Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 22:54:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 22:54:32 -0500 Received: from h24-65-192-120.cg.shawcable.net ([24.65.192.120]:3321 "EHLO webber.adilger.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 22:54:18 -0500 From: Andreas Dilger Message-Id: <200102030353.f133rt002211@webber.adilger.net> Subject: Re: A buglet with LVM-0.9.1 In-Reply-To: <3A7A1519.E140A726@toyota.com> from J Sloan at "Feb 1, 2001 06:02:01 pm" To: J Sloan Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 20:53:54 -0700 (MST) CC: Linux kernel X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org J Sloan writes: > I discovered that lvm seems to have a problem > with compaq raid controllers - the partitions > don't have the normal names like /dev/sda1, > but instead names like /dev/ida/c0d0p1 - > > lvm seems to works OK, but lvmdiskscan freaks... > > lvmdiskscan -- filling directory cache... > lvmdiskscan -- walking through all found disks / partitions > lvmdiskscan -- /dev/ida/c0d0p1 [ 1000.06 MB] free whole disk > lvmdiskscan -- no valid disks / partitions found > lvmdiskscan -- please check your disk device special files! LVM _should_ take care of such devices as well, because there are several block devices which don't live directly in /dev, especially with devfs. According to "lvm_dir_cache.c", it should already check /dev/ida for disks. If it doesn't work for you, this is a bug. It would be useful if you ran "lvmdiskscan -d" and "cat /proc/partitions" and sent the output to linux-lvm@sistina.com Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger \ "If a man ate a pound of pasta and a pound of antipasto, \ would they cancel out, leaving him still hungry?" http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/ -- Dogbert - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/