Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 17:51:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 17:51:00 -0400 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust42.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.42]:968 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 17:51:00 -0400 Subject: RE: [PATCH] hyper-threading information in /proc/cpuinfo From: Alan Cox To: "Nakajima, Jun" Cc: Robert Love , "'Dave Jones'" , "'akpm@digeo.com'" , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" , "'chrisl@vmware.com'" , "'Martin J. Bligh'" In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 25 Oct 2002 23:14:36 +0100 Message-Id: <1035584076.13032.96.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 811 Lines: 25 On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 22:50, Nakajima, Jun wrote: > Sorry, > > Can you please change "siblings\t" to "threads\t\t". SuSE 8.1, for example, > is already doing it: Could do > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP > + if (cpu_has_ht) { > + seq_printf(m, "physical id\t: %d\n", phys_proc_id[n]); > + seq_printf(m, "threads\t\t: %d\n", smp_num_siblings); > + } > +#endif Im just wondering what we would then use to describe a true multiple cpu on a die x86. Im curious what the powerpc people think since they have this kind of stuff - is there a generic terminology they prefer ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/