Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:13:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:13:01 -0400 Received: from bozo.vmware.com ([65.113.40.131]:38668 "EHLO mailout1.vmware.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:12:29 -0400 Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:19:25 -0700 From: chrisl@vmware.com To: Robert Love Cc: "Nakajima, Jun" , Alan Cox , "'Dave Jones'" , "'akpm@digeo.com'" , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" , "'Martin J. Bligh'" Subject: Re: [PATCH] hyper-threading information in /proc/cpuinfo Message-ID: <20021025221925.GF1397@vmware.com> References: <1035582867.734.3953.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1035582867.734.3953.camel@phantasy> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 890 Lines: 30 I don't have a strong preference to pick up between this two. But please stick to the same name when this come to an conclusion. I hate to put code said if Redhat do this if SuSE do that that kind of crap. Thanks Chris PS, any idea will this available in 2.4 soon? On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 05:54:26PM -0400, Robert Love wrote: > On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 17:50, Nakajima, Jun wrote: > > > Can you please change "siblings\t" to "threads\t\t". SuSE 8.1, for example, > > is already doing it: > > But RedHat apparently is using siblings. 2.4-ac also uses siblings. > And I like "siblings" better so it wins in my opinion. > > Robert Love > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/