Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 19:19:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 19:19:05 -0400 Received: from svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com ([24.136.46.5]:52496 "EHLO svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 19:19:04 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] hyper-threading information in /proc/cpuinfo From: Robert Love To: "David D. Hagood" Cc: Jeff Garzik , "Nakajima, Jun" , Daniel Phillips , Alan Cox , "'Dave Jones'" , "'akpm@digeo.com'" , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" , "'chrisl@vmware.com'" , "'Martin J. Bligh'" In-Reply-To: <3DB9D1FE.5010607@sktc.net> References: <3DB9CC5D.7000600@pobox.com> <3DB9D1FE.5010607@sktc.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 25 Oct 2002 19:25:09 -0400 Message-Id: <1035588310.734.4165.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 890 Lines: 23 On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 19:21, David D. Hagood wrote: > Might I suggest "subcore", since that's really what it is - a sub-core > in the main chip. > > My siblings are distinct entities from me, my sub-parts aren't. > (now, were I part of a cojoined twin....) Sibling makes sense if you look at the N processors in the package as "siblings of each other" i.e. not a hierarchy (as subcore implies) but just a "set of virtual processors in the same core". If there are subcores, then I think there must be some major core. If two chips are siblings, then that merely says they are related (in this case, the same parent package). Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/