Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 02:32:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 02:32:31 -0400 Received: from uucp.cistron.nl ([62.216.30.38]:43018 "EHLO ncc1701.cistron.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 02:32:31 -0400 From: Rene Blokland Subject: Re: loadlin with 2.5.?? kernels Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 08:32:14 +0200 Organization: Cistron Message-ID: References: <5.1.0.14.2.20021026064044.00b9a310@pop.gmx.net> <5.1.0.14.2.20021020192952.00b95e80@pop.gmx.net> <5.1.0.14.2.20021021192410.00b4ffb8@pop.gmx.net> <007501c27b37$144cf240$6400a8c0@mikeg> <5.1.0.14.2.20021026064044.00b9a310@pop.gmx.net> <5.1.0.14.2.20021026073915.00b55008@pop.gmx.net> Reply-To: reneb@cistron.nl X-Trace: ncc1701.cistron.net 1035614291 17403 195.64.94.30 (26 Oct 2002 06:38:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@cistron.nl To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 586 Lines: 9 In article <5.1.0.14.2.20021026073915.00b55008@pop.gmx.net>, Mike Galbraith wrote: didn't loose much argument wise > ;-) The other loadlin user reported failure at .38, so maybe your patch is > needed sometimes even with loadlin-1.6c. (other loadlin user listening?) Yes, I'm there and use 1.6c -- Groeten / Regards, Rene J. Blokland - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/