Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754221Ab3JXJQ1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Oct 2013 05:16:27 -0400 Received: from smtp0.epfl.ch ([128.178.224.218]:46778 "EHLO smtp0.epfl.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753823Ab3JXJQ0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Oct 2013 05:16:26 -0400 Message-ID: <5268E566.2060309@epfl.ch> Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 11:16:22 +0200 From: Florian Vaussard Reply-To: florian.vaussard@epfl.ch User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dmitry Torokhov , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Peter Ujfalusi , Sachin Kamat , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 1/3] Input: twl4030-pwrbutton - add device tree support References: <1382550852-11508-1-git-send-email-sre@debian.org> <1382550852-11508-2-git-send-email-sre@debian.org> <5268D095.3060302@epfl.ch> <20131024083837.GA28938@earth.universe> In-Reply-To: <20131024083837.GA28938@earth.universe> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2080 Lines: 67 Hello, On 10/24/2013 10:38 AM, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > Hi Florian, > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 09:47:33AM +0200, Florian Vaussard wrote: >>> +Required SoC Specific Properties: >>> +- compatible: should be one of the following >>> + - "ti,twl4030-pwrbutton": For controllers compatible with twl4030 >>> +- interrupt: should be one of the following >>> + - <8>: For controllers compatible with twl4030 >> >> This is <8> for your particular case, but it will depend on your >> SoC, won't it? Moreover, this property will be most likely >> inherited from the root twl node, so I do not see the need to >> document it here. See: >> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/twl-familly.txt > > No. This is an internal twl4030 interrupt. TWL4030 functions > itself as an interrupt controller. > So if it does not belong to the TWL parent, where is it used in your code? You should be parsing this property, so you can set up the IRQ properly. I am a bit confused here. If it is fixed, no need for a OF property. >>> + >>> +Example: >>> + twl_pwrbutton: pwrbutton { >>> + compatible = "ti,twl4030-pwrbutton"; >>> + interrupts = <8>; >>> + }; >> >> You are missing the root twl node here, no? > > So should I document it like this? > IMHO it is more clear for the user. > twl4030 { > compatible = "ti,twl4030"; > > pwrbutton { > compatible = "ti,twl4030-pwrbutton"; > interrupts = <8>; > }; > }; Nit, but existing documentations follow the "name@address" form for the root node, as the TWL is on an I2C bus. Either it is already defined, thus you should use "&twl4030" to reference it, or you create the TWL node and something like "twl4030@48" should be used. For an example, you can refer to existing bindings, like Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/twl4030-audio.txt. Best regards, Florian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/