Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 09:32:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 09:32:15 -0400 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust42.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.42]:45514 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 09:32:15 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Double x86 initialise fix. From: Alan Cox To: davej@codemonkey.org.uk Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , alan@redhat.com In-Reply-To: <200210261242.g9QCgSqp030280@noodles.internal> References: <200210261242.g9QCgSqp030280@noodles.internal> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 26 Oct 2002 14:56:20 +0100 Message-Id: <1035640580.13032.100.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 659 Lines: 17 On Sat, 2002-10-26 at 13:42, davej@codemonkey.org.uk wrote: > For many moons, we've been executing identify_cpu() > on the boot processor twice on SMP kernels. > This is harmless, but has a few downsides.. > - Extra cruft in bootlog/dmesg > - Spawns one too many timers for the mcheck handler > - possibly other wasteful things.. > > This seems to do the right thing here.. How do you know the boot CPU is CPU#0 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/