Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 09:51:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 09:51:13 -0400 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:51507 "EHLO frodo.biederman.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 09:51:11 -0400 To: Pavel Machek Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suparna Bhattacharya , Petr Vandrovec , fastboot@osdl.org, Werner Almesberger Subject: Re: kexec for 2.5.44 (Who do I send this to?) References: <20021020190939.GA913@elf.ucw.cz> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: 26 Oct 2002 07:54:41 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20021020190939.GA913@elf.ucw.cz> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 837 Lines: 20 Pavel Machek writes: > Hi! > > > The kexec code has gone through a fairly decent review, and all known bugs > > are resolved. There are still BIOS's that don't work after you have > > run a kernel but that is an entirely different problem. > > Looks good... Few comments follow. > Perhaps this should be done using driverfs callbacks? SMP must be stopped and the APIC shutdown as the very last thing to happen. The order dependency is a very real, and ugly things happen when it doesn't happen as the very last thing. Does driverfs have a way to express that? Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/