Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 11:22:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 11:22:17 -0400 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust42.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.42]:30923 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 11:22:17 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Double x86 initialise fix. From: Alan Cox To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: Alan Cox , Dave Jones , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <3007712682.1035619204@[10.10.2.3]> References: <200210261357.g9QDvgl13774@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <3007712682.1035619204@[10.10.2.3]> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 26 Oct 2002 16:46:20 +0100 Message-Id: <1035647180.13244.121.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 828 Lines: 20 On Sat, 2002-10-26 at 16:00, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > >> Isn't this always the case on x86 ? > >> /me waits to hear gory details of some IBM monster. > > > > It isnt. The boot CPU may be any number. In addition you can strap dual > > pentium boxes to arbitrate for who is boot cpu (this is used for fault > > tolerance). > > Eh? I don't understand this, and I think Dave is right for all the > IBM monsters I know of ;-) The *apicid* may not be 0 but the CPU > numbers are dynamically assigned as we boot, so the boot CPU will > always get 0, surely? Ok its a logical ID - so yes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/