Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 14:54:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 14:54:22 -0400 Received: from franka.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.44]:57556 "EHLO franka.aracnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 14:54:21 -0400 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 11:58:02 -0700 From: "Martin J. Bligh" Reply-To: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Erich Focht , Michael Hohnbaum , landley@trommello.org cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Crunch time -- the musical. (2.5 merge candidate list 1.5) Message-ID: <3021989731.1035633481@[10.10.2.3]> In-Reply-To: <200210251015.46388.efocht@ess.nec.de> References: <200210251015.46388.efocht@ess.nec.de> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.2 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1630 Lines: 31 >> I still haven't been able to get your scheduler to boot for about >> the last month without crashing the system. Andrew says he has it >> booting somehow on 2.5.44-mm4, so I'll steal his kernel tommorow and >> see how it looks. If the numbers look good for doing boring things >> like kernel compile, SDET, etc, I'm happy. > > I thought this problem is well understood! For some reasons independent of > my patch you have to boot your machines with the "notsc" option. This > leaves the cache_decay_ticks variable initialized to zero which my patch > doesn't like. I'm trying to deal with this inside the patch but there is > still a small window when the variable is zero. In my opinion this needs > to be fixed somewhere in arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c. Booting a machine > with cache_decay_ticks=0 is pure nonsense, as it switches off cache > affinity which you absolutely need! So even if "notsc" is a legal option, > it should be fixed such that it doesn't leave your machine without cache > affinity. That would anyway give you a falsified behavior of the O(1) > scheduler. Oh, not sure if I ever replied to this or not. I don't *have* to boot with notsc, I just usually do. And it crashed either way, so it's a different problem (changing versions of gcc seems to perturb it too). BUT ... your new patches 1 and 2 don't have this problem. See followup email in a second. M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/