Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 3 Feb 2001 02:50:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 3 Feb 2001 02:50:43 -0500 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:33546 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 3 Feb 2001 02:50:35 -0500 Subject: Re: bidirectional named pipe? To: Brendan.Miller@Dialogic.com (Miller, Brendan) Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 07:51:41 +0000 (GMT) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ('linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org') In-Reply-To: from "Miller, Brendan" at Feb 02, 2001 07:33:09 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I'm porting some software to Linux that requires use of a bidirectional, > named pipe. The architecture is as follows: A server creates a named pipe Pipes are not bidirectional in Linux. We follow traditional non stream behaviour > /dev/spx". I experiemented with socket-based pipes under Linux, but I > couldn't gain access to them by open()ing the name. Is there help? I AF_UNIX sockets are bidirectional but like all sockets use bind() and connect(). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/