Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 12:44:33 +0800
From: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: query for idea about a kexec regression
Message-ID: <20131027044433.GB18689@dhcp-16-126.nay.redhat.com>
References: <20131027043023.GA18689@dhcp-16-126.nay.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20131027043023.GA18689@dhcp-16-126.nay.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 889
Lines: 27

typo: mail address of x86@kernel.org

On 10/27/13 at 12:30pm, Dave Young wrote:
> Hi
> 
> While I testing efi runtime patches for kexec kernel, there's
> 2 machines kexec fails on them. It can be reproduced with
> non-efi kernel, so it's not related to the patchset.
> 
> Problem is kexec kernel will immediatly reboot after below
> kernel message:
> smpboot: Booting Node   0, Processors  #   1
> 
> The latter CPUs were not printed.
> 
> nr_cpus=1 works, so there might be some bug on smp code.
> 
> Any idea or suspection acout some patches? This is not 100%
> reproducible, to me it's about 30% thus it's hard to bisect.
> 
> Thanks
> Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/