From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@sdfg.com.ar>
Cc: namhyung.kim@lge.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        acme@ghostprotocols.net, asharma@fb.com, fweisbec@gmail.com
Subject: Re: State of "perf: Add a new sort order: SORT_INCLUSIVE"
References: <20131025150721.GA12534@sdfg.com.ar>
	<8761si9e1u.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
	<20131028084244.GA7482@sdfg.com.ar>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 18:09:30 +0900
In-Reply-To: <20131028084244.GA7482@sdfg.com.ar> (Rodrigo Campos's message of
	"Mon, 28 Oct 2013 08:42:44 +0000")
Message-ID: <877gcx92yd.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1245
Lines: 31

On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 08:42:44 +0000, Rodrigo Campos wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 02:09:49PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> Anyway, You can find the series and discussion on the link below:
>> 
>>   https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/13/81
>
> I've read the cover letter for that series and probably because I don't know
> about perf internals I have a question: How will "--culumate" interact with
> "--sort=dso" for example ?
>
> I mean, is it possible for that to show more than 100% ? (if you add all the
> 93.35% in your example in the cover letter, or something similar). Or
> "--culumate --sort=dso" will just group together all entries that have a dso in
> the call chain ?

Hmm.. I think --cumulate option is only meaningful when sort order
includes symbol.  Maybe I can add support for --sort=dso case as well
but not sure it's worth.  Do you think it's really needed?

>
> Sorry if the question was too obvious if I knew about perf internals :S

No need to sorry about it. :)

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/