Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755545Ab3J1JaN (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Oct 2013 05:30:13 -0400 Received: from alerce.vps.bitfolk.com ([85.119.82.134]:40219 "EHLO alerce.vps.bitfolk.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754172Ab3J1JaL (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Oct 2013 05:30:11 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:29:55 +0000 From: Rodrigo Campos To: Namhyung Kim Cc: namhyung.kim@lge.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@ghostprotocols.net, asharma@fb.com, fweisbec@gmail.com Subject: Re: State of "perf: Add a new sort order: SORT_INCLUSIVE" Message-ID: <20131028092955.GB7482@sdfg.com.ar> References: <20131025150721.GA12534@sdfg.com.ar> <8761si9e1u.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> <20131028084244.GA7482@sdfg.com.ar> <877gcx92yd.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <877gcx92yd.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1720 Lines: 44 On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 06:09:30PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 08:42:44 +0000, Rodrigo Campos wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 02:09:49PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > >> Anyway, You can find the series and discussion on the link below: > >> > >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/13/81 > > > > I've read the cover letter for that series and probably because I don't know > > about perf internals I have a question: How will "--culumate" interact with > > "--sort=dso" for example ? > > > > I mean, is it possible for that to show more than 100% ? (if you add all the > > 93.35% in your example in the cover letter, or something similar). Or > > "--culumate --sort=dso" will just group together all entries that have a dso in > > the call chain ? > > Hmm.. I think --cumulate option is only meaningful when sort order > includes symbol. Maybe I can add support for --sort=dso case as well > but not sure it's worth. Do you think it's really needed? I don't know if it is *needed*, but that was what I need :) I mean, what I was looking for is a way to know the percentage spent when some symbol in the call chain belongs to a DSO. Like group all samples that have a symbol of a DSO in the callchain, and know the percentage for that group. Something like the "inclusive" time spent inside a library. > > Sorry if the question was too obvious if I knew about perf internals :S > > No need to sorry about it. :) Thanks =) Thanks again, Rodrigo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/