Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757875Ab3J1Xbk (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Oct 2013 19:31:40 -0400 Received: from mail-ea0-f169.google.com ([209.85.215.169]:33785 "EHLO mail-ea0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757686Ab3J1Xbi (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Oct 2013 19:31:38 -0400 From: Tomasz Figa To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Olof Johansson , Kumar Gala , Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Kevin Hilman , Russell King , Pawel Moll , Arnd Bergmann , Stephen Warren , Tomasz Figa , Ian Campbell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Alexandre Courbot , linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Dave Martin Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/5] ARM: add basic support for Trusted Foundations Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 00:31:36 +0100 Message-ID: <2702565.PHk13m6fVo@flatron> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.2 (Linux/3.11.6-gentoo; KDE/4.11.2; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20131028215649.GB10833@quad.lixom.net> References: <1382956118-12495-1-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com> <20131028215649.GB10833@quad.lixom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3595 Lines: 83 On Monday 28 of October 2013 14:56:49 Olof Johansson wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 05:57:04AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Oct 28, 2013, at 5:28 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > > > Trusted Foundations is a TrustZone-based secure monitor for ARM that > > > can be invoked using the same SMC-based API on all supported > > > platforms. This patch adds initial basic support for Trusted > > > Foundations using the ARM firmware API. Current features are limited > > > to the ability to boot secondary processors. > > > > > > Note: The API followed by Trusted Foundations does *not* follow the > > > SMC > > > calling conventions. It has nothing to do with PSCI neither and is > > > only > > > relevant to devices that use Trusted Foundations (like most > > > Tegra-based > > > retail devices). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot > > > Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa > > > Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren > > > --- > > > .../arm/firmware/tl,trusted-foundations.txt | 20 ++++++ > > > .../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 + > > > arch/arm/Kconfig | 2 + > > > arch/arm/Makefile | 1 + > > > arch/arm/firmware/Kconfig | 28 ++++++++ > > > arch/arm/firmware/Makefile | 1 + > > > arch/arm/firmware/trusted_foundations.c | 79 > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/include/asm/trusted_foundations.h > > > | 67 ++++++++++++++++++ 8 files changed, 199 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/firmware/tl,trusted-foundatio > > > ns.txt create mode 100644 arch/arm/firmware/Kconfig > > > create mode 100644 arch/arm/firmware/Makefile > > > create mode 100644 arch/arm/firmware/trusted_foundations.c > > > create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/trusted_foundations.h > > > > > > diff --git > > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/firmware/tl,trusted-foundat > > > ions.txt > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/firmware/tl,trusted-foundat > > > ions.txt new file mode 100644 > > > index 0000000..2ec75c9 > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/firmware/tl,trusted-foundat > > > ions.txt @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ > > > +Trusted Foundations > > > +------------------- > > > + > > > +Boards that use the Trusted Foundations secure monitor can signal > > > its > > > +presence by declaring a node compatible with > > > "tl,trusted-foundations" > > > +under the /firmware/ node > > > + > > > +Required properties: > > > +- compatible : "tl,trusted-foundations" > > > +- version-major : major version number of Trusted Foundations > > > firmware > > > +- version-minor: minor version number of Trusted Foundations > > > firmware > > > > vendor prefix version. > > Are you saying he should use tl,version-major tl,version-minor? For > bindings that are already vendor-specific we haven't (on ARM) asked for > vendor prefix on properties. It doesn't mean that we should keep going > down that route though, so I'm just asking for clarification for my own > edification. :) This is a good question. We should decide what the right thing (TM) is and write it down. I, on the contrary, was convinced that it's the way Kumar says. Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/