Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758165Ab3J2Pq3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:46:29 -0400 Received: from mail-yh0-f52.google.com ([209.85.213.52]:36157 "EHLO mail-yh0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751168Ab3J2PqZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:46:25 -0400 Message-ID: <526FD849.9050000@samsung.com> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 08:46:17 -0700 From: Kukjin Kim User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomasz Figa CC: Mike Turquette , Kukjin Kim , mark.rutland@arm.com, swarren@wwwdotorg.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, Tomasz Figa , s.nawrocki@samsung.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, Mateusz Krawczuk , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, thomas.abraham@linaro.org, t.stanislaws@samsung.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, rob.herring@calxeda.com, rjw@sisk.pl, ben-linux@fluff.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, b.zolnierkie@samsung.com, rob@landley.net Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] ARM: S5PV210: move to common clk framework References: <1380027009-2239-1-git-send-email-m.krawczuk@partner.samsung.com> <5264425E.4040301@samsung.com> <20131021121605.11944.74007@quantum> <1823897.8rOixkM4PW@amdc1227> In-Reply-To: <1823897.8rOixkM4PW@amdc1227> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3255 Lines: 83 On 10/29/13 04:42, Tomasz Figa wrote: > Hi Kukjin, Mike, > > On Monday 21 of October 2013 05:16:05 Mike Turquette wrote: >> Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-10-20 13:51:42) >>> On 10/20/13 01:03, Tomasz Figa wrote: >>>> Hi Mike, Kukjin, Rafael, >>>> >>>> On Tuesday 24 of September 2013 14:50:06 Mateusz Krawczuk wrote: >>>>> This patch series is the new s5pv210 clock implementation >>>>> (using common clk framework). >>>>> >>>>> This implementation is compatible with device tree definition and board >>>>> files. >>>>> >>>>> This patch series is based on linux-next and has been tested on goni and >>>>> aquila >>>>> boards using board file. >>>>> >>>>> Since v4: >>>>> Corrected mux flags for finpll. >>>>> >>>>> Since v3: >>>>> >>>>> Replace s5pv210_clk_register_finpll, by creating mux finpll >>>>> with xusbxti and xxti as parrents. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Mateusz Krawczuk (3): >>>>> clk: samsung: Add clock driver for s5pc110/s5pv210 >>>>> Cpufreq: s5pv210 cpufreq fixes for CCF >>>>> ARM: s5pv210: Migrate clock handling to Common Clock Framework >>>>> >>>>> .../bindings/clock/samsung,s5pv210-clock.txt | 75 +++ >>>>> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig | 9 + >>>>> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile | 4 +- >>>>> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/common.c | 17 + >>>>> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/common.h | 10 + >>>>> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-goni.c | 2 +- >>>>> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-smdkv210.c | 2 +- >>>>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig | 2 +- >>>>> drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile | 3 + >>>>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s5pv210.c | 673 >>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c >>>>> | 6 +- >>>>> include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,s5pv210-clock.h | 224 +++++++ >>>>> 12 files changed, 1019 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >>>>> create mode 100644 >>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/samsung,s5pv210-clock.txt >>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s5pv210.c >>>>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,s5pv210-clock.h >>>> >>>> I believe this series is reasonable to be applied. Could we agree on >>>> the tree it would go through and get all tne required acks? >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Tomasz >>> >>> I agree. >>> >>> Mike, how do you think the common clk stuff for s5pv210? >> >> Clock code looks good to me. Which tree do you want to take it through? > > Seems like we just missed another kernel release. It's a bit sad that it's > happening so often for Samsung patches... > Tomasz, sorry about that, I couldn't end up the stuff before attending ARM Kernel Summit, but in my opinion, this series would be merged for upcoming merge window via clk tree if Mike is fine because there is no conflicts with Samsung tree. Mike, how do you think? If you're OK, please pick this into your tree with my ack. Thanks, Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/