Message-ID: <1383081359.22833.21.camel@x220.thuisdomein>
Subject: Re: Revert 9745cdb36da83aeec198650b410ca06304cf792 ("select: use
 freezable blocking call")?
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>, Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 22:15:59 +0100
In-Reply-To: <52702170.7080003@intel.com>
References: <1383075705.22833.18.camel@x220.thuisdomein>
	 <52702170.7080003@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 646
Lines: 22

On Tue, 2013-10-29 at 21:58 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On 10/29/2013 8:41 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > 4) Should this commit be reverted? Or is there a better fix?
> 
> In short, yes, it should.
> 
> I've already queued up a revert of something very similar and I'm going 
> to revert this one too.

If you do, the revert should go into stable for v3.11+ too, shouldn't
it?

Thanks,


Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/