Message-ID: <5270270E.10905@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 22:22:22 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Organization: Intel Technology Poland Sp. z o. o., KRS 101882, ul. Slowackiego
 173, 80-298 Gdansk
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
CC: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>, Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Revert 9745cdb36da83aeec198650b410ca06304cf792 ("select: use
 freezable blocking call")?
References: <1383075705.22833.18.camel@x220.thuisdomein>	 <52702170.7080003@intel.com> <1383081359.22833.21.camel@x220.thuisdomein>
In-Reply-To: <1383081359.22833.21.camel@x220.thuisdomein>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 750
Lines: 21

On 10/29/2013 10:15 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-10-29 at 21:58 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On 10/29/2013 8:41 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
>>> 4) Should this commit be reverted? Or is there a better fix?
>> In short, yes, it should.
>>
>> I've already queued up a revert of something very similar and I'm going
>> to revert this one too.
> If you do, the revert should go into stable for v3.11+ too, shouldn't
> it?

I'll ask stable to pick it up later (or you can do that too).

Thanks,
Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/