Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 23:36:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 23:36:49 -0500 Received: from dp.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]:14979 "EHLO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 23:36:48 -0500 From: Rusty Russell To: Davide Libenzi Cc: Hugh Dickins , mingming cao , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH]updated ipc lock patch In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 27 Oct 2002 17:35:58 -0800." Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:10:10 +1100 Message-Id: <20021028044308.CE3292C0C7@lists.samba.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1065 Lines: 39 In message y ou write: > On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Rusty Russell wrote: > > > +struct ipc_rcu_kmalloc > > +{ > > + struct rcu_head rcu; > > + /* "void *" makes sure alignment of following data is sane. */ > > + void *data[0]; > > +}; > > Rusty, why not using gcc "aligned" keywords instead of black magic : > > void *data[0]; I think it's clearer *why* it's being done than: struct ipc_rcu_kmalloc { struct rcu_head rcu; } __attribute__((aligned(__alignof__(void *)))); And simpler than: struct ipc_rcu_kmalloc { struct rcu_head rcu; /* "void *" makes sure alignment of following data is sane. */ char data[0] __attribute__((aligned(__alignof__(void *)))); }; Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/