Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752805Ab3JaGGU (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Oct 2013 02:06:20 -0400 Received: from 10.mo6.mail-out.ovh.net ([87.98.157.236]:58036 "EHLO mo6.mail-out.ovh.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752629Ab3JaGGT (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Oct 2013 02:06:19 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 1805 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 02:06:18 EDT Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 06:30:37 +0100 From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD To: Bo Shen Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Johan Hovold , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Nicolas Ferre , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] misc: atmel_pwm: set initcall level to subsys Message-ID: <20131031053037.GA30542@ns203013.ovh.net> References: <1382459560-26596-1-git-send-email-jhovold@gmail.com> <20131029232249.GA20476@kroah.com> <20131030110705.GA29813@localhost> <201310302146.18248.arnd@arndb.de> <5271B012.4060200@atmel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5271B012.4060200@atmel.com> X-PGP-Key: http://uboot.jcrosoft.org/plagnioj.asc X-PGP-key-fingerprint: 6309 2BBA 16C8 3A07 1772 CC24 DEFC FFA3 279C CE7C User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 16938319674227469107 X-Ovh-Remote: 91.121.171.124 (ns203013.ovh.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-OVH-SPAMSTATE: OK X-OVH-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-OVH-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeeiledrgeekucetufdoteggodetrfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeeiledrgeekucetufdoteggodetrfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1472 Lines: 44 On 09:19 Thu 31 Oct , Bo Shen wrote: > Hi Arnd, > > On 10/31/2013 04:46, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >On Wednesday 30 October 2013, Johan Hovold wrote: > >>>I really hate this type of patch, as it's papering over the real > >>>problem. What happens when someone else moves their driver to this > >>>level? Then you are back to the original problem. > >> > >>Yes, it's crude, but it's currently the only way to express a preferred > >>probe order. > > > >Does the same problem occur with the generic PWM subsystem? > > > >The atmel_pwm driver apparently is the last PWM driver that has > >not been converted to the generic subsystem yet. Doing that would > >also let us drop the atmel-pwm-bl driver in favor of the generic > >backlight. > > The atmel pwm driver is on the way to generic subsystem. more > information at: > --->8--- > PWM: atmel-pwm: add PWM controller driver: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2963081/ so the fix can be drop in favor of the conversion Best Regards, J. > ---<8--- > > Best Regards, > Bo Shen > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/