Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 3 Feb 2001 09:25:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 3 Feb 2001 09:25:09 -0500 Received: from smtpde02.sap-ag.de ([194.39.131.53]:26351 "EHLO smtpde02.sap-ag.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 3 Feb 2001 09:24:52 -0500 To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: "J . A . Magallon" , "H . Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.1 In-Reply-To: <20010123205315.A4662@werewolf.able.es> <95csna$vb6$1@cesium.transmeta.com> <20010202215254.C2498@werewolf.able.es> <3A7B1EDC.DA2588BA@transmeta.com> From: Christoph Rohland In-Reply-To: <3A7B1EDC.DA2588BA@transmeta.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Bryce Canyon) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: 03 Feb 2001 15:28:50 +0100 Lines: 14 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "H. Peter Anvin" writes: > > Mmmmmm, does this mean that mounting /dev/shm is no more needed ? > > One step more towards easy 2.2 <-> 2.4 switching... Yes, it is no longer needed. You will need for POSIX shm, but there are not a lot of program out there using it. > In some ways it's kind of sad. I found the /dev/shm interface to be > rather appealing :) I totally agree :( Christoph - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/