Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:28:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:28:15 -0500 Received: from bay-bridge.veritas.com ([143.127.3.10]:62715 "EHLO mtvmime03.VERITAS.COM") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:28:14 -0500 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:35:15 +0000 (GMT) From: Hugh Dickins X-X-Sender: hugh@localhost.localdomain To: "David S. Miller" cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] shmem missing cache flush In-Reply-To: <20021028.061059.38206858.davem@redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1224 Lines: 32 > On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Hugh Dickins > Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 00:57:30 +0100 (BST) > > I would be much happier about adding it, if you could tell me that > I can then remove the flush_page_to_ram(page) from shmem_nopage? > > No we still have to support platforms using flush_page_to_ram() > > I didn't get a chance to deprecate this in 2.5.x, I wish I had. On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Alan Cox > Date: 21 Oct 2002 17:12:22 +0100 > > Send me the diffs Im happy to give them a spin. > > Here goes. I contacted Anton and Paulus about flush_icache_page as > that is on the hitlist next and ppc/ppc64 is the only well maintained > port using that. I like your patch, but what has changed? Are those platforms which were using flush_page_to_ram() now committed to its elimination? Or have they already replaced it (not seen in your patch)? Hugh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/