Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:36:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:36:55 -0500 Received: from bozo.vmware.com ([65.113.40.131]:25095 "EHLO mailout1.vmware.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:36:54 -0500 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:44:20 -0800 From: chrisl@vmware.com To: Christoph Rohland Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chrisl@gnuchina.org, Alan Cox Subject: Re: writepage return value check in vmscan.c Message-ID: <20021028184420.GB1454@vmware.com> References: <20021024082505.GB1471@vmware.com> <3DB7B11B.9E552CFF@digeo.com> <20021024175718.GA1398@vmware.com> <20021024183327.GS3354@dualathlon.random> <20021024191531.GD1398@vmware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 964 Lines: 32 They are the same as shmfs to linux kernel. Why does vmware not use it in the first place? It is possible due to some the history reason. BTW, I have another question. For the 8G memory machine, do we need to setup 16G swap space? Think about the time it take to write 16G data, does it still make sense that swap space is twice as big as memory? And the swap partition has limit as 2G. So we need to setup 8 swap partitions if we want 16G swap. Thanks Chris On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 09:28:22AM +0100, Christoph Rohland wrote: > On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, chrisl@vmware.com wrote: > > Yes, shmfs seems to be the only choice so far. > > So why don't you use Posix or SYSV shared mem? > > Greetings > Christoph > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/