Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753098AbaACTBx (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jan 2014 14:01:53 -0500 Received: from mail-qc0-f178.google.com ([209.85.216.178]:34902 "EHLO mail-qc0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752658AbaACTBu (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jan 2014 14:01:50 -0500 Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 17:01:11 -0200 From: Leandro Dorileo To: Lan Tianyu Cc: lenb@kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fcr@adinet.com.uy, "3.8+" Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI/Battery: Add a _BIX quirk for NEC LZ750/LS Message-ID: <20140103190033.GA20314@dorilex-lnv.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <1388648277-23453-1-git-send-email-tianyu.lan@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1388648277-23453-1-git-send-email-tianyu.lan@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3226 Lines: 98 On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 03:37:57PM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote: > The aml method _BIX of NEC LZ750/LS returns a broken package which > skip the first member "Revision" according ACPI 5.0 spec Table 10-234. > > This patch is to add a quirk for this machine to skip member "Revision" > during parsing _BIX returned package. > > Reported-and-tested-by: Francisco Castro > Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67351 > Cc: 3.8+ > Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu > --- > drivers/acpi/battery.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c > index fbf1ace..3d64a87 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c > @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ MODULE_AUTHOR("Alexey Starikovskiy "); > MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ACPI Battery Driver"); > MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); > > +static int battery_bix_broken_package; > static unsigned int cache_time = 1000; > module_param(cache_time, uint, 0644); > MODULE_PARM_DESC(cache_time, "cache time in milliseconds"); > @@ -416,7 +417,12 @@ static int acpi_battery_get_info(struct acpi_battery *battery) > ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Evaluating %s", name)); > return -ENODEV; > } > - if (test_bit(ACPI_BATTERY_XINFO_PRESENT, &battery->flags)) > + > + if (battery_bix_broken_package) > + result = extract_package(battery, buffer.pointer, > + extended_info_offsets + 1, > + ARRAY_SIZE(extended_info_offsets) - 1); > + else if (test_bit(ACPI_BATTERY_XINFO_PRESENT, &battery->flags)) > result = extract_package(battery, buffer.pointer, > extended_info_offsets, > ARRAY_SIZE(extended_info_offsets)); > @@ -754,6 +760,24 @@ static int battery_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, > return 0; > } > > +static int battery_bix_package_quirk(const struct dmi_system_id *id) > +{ > + battery_bix_broken_package = 1; > + return 0; > +} > + Do you really need this callback? Why don't you just do: if (dmi_check_system(bat_dmi_table)) battery_bix_broken_package = 1; > +static struct dmi_system_id bat_dmi_table[] = { > + { > + .callback = battery_bix_package_quirk, > + .ident = "NEC LZ750/LS", > + .matches = { > + DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "NEC"), > + DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "PC-LZ750LS"), > + }, > + }, > + {}, > +}; > + > static int acpi_battery_add(struct acpi_device *device) > { > int result = 0; > @@ -846,6 +870,8 @@ static void __init acpi_battery_init_async(void *unused, async_cookie_t cookie) > { > if (acpi_disabled) > return; > + > + dmi_check_system(bat_dmi_table); > acpi_bus_register_driver(&acpi_battery_driver); > } > > -- > 1.7.9.5 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Leandro Dorileo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/