Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:48:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:48:31 -0500 Received: from bjl1.asuk.net.64.29.81.in-addr.arpa ([81.29.64.88]:57255 "EHLO bjl1.asuk.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:48:31 -0500 Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 01:53:38 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier To: bert hubert , Davide Libenzi , Hanna Linder , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-aio@vger.kernel.org, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll Message-ID: <20021029015338.GC18727@bjl1.asuk.net> References: <20021028220809.GB27798@outpost.ds9a.nl> <20021028234434.GB18415@bjl1.asuk.net> <20021029000339.GA31212@outpost.ds9a.nl> <20021029004805.GA18727@bjl1.asuk.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021029004805.GA18727@bjl1.asuk.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 700 Lines: 19 Jamie Lokier wrote: > bert hubert wrote: > > > :( I was hoping sys_epoll would be scalable without increasing the > > > number of system calls per event. > > > > I see only one call per event? sys_epoll_wait. Perhaps sys_epoll_ctl to > > register a new interest. > > As David pointed out, you need a second call before the sys_epoll_wait > if you're waiting for fds that epoll doesn't support (such as a tty). ^ insert "also" -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/