Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:29:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:29:05 -0500 Received: from x35.xmailserver.org ([208.129.208.51]:59037 "EHLO x35.xmailserver.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:29:04 -0500 X-AuthUser: davidel@xmailserver.org Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 18:44:50 -0800 (PST) From: Davide Libenzi X-X-Sender: davide@blue1.dev.mcafeelabs.com To: Jamie Lokier cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Subject: Re: and nicer too - Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll In-Reply-To: <20021029020545.GD18727@bjl1.asuk.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 729 Lines: 23 On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Jamie Lokier wrote: > > > > 2) epoll must be used on non-blocking sockets only > > (and describe the race that happens otherwise) > > That much is implied simply by epoll being a queue of not_ready->ready > edge transitions. It would be good for the manual to explain this, > but it is clearly implied by the API if you think about it. Bert and Hanna are working on man pages right now with the aim of adding those notes ... - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/