Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933065AbaAFX56 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jan 2014 18:57:58 -0500 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:15268 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932192AbaAFX54 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jan 2014 18:57:56 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,615,1384329600"; d="scan'208";a="454529401" Message-ID: <52CB4303.10207@intel.com> Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 15:57:55 -0800 From: Alexander Duyck User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "H. Peter Anvin" , Greg KH CC: joe@perches.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Only flag FSF address, not gnu.org URL References: <20140106231534.23578.11475.stgit@ahduyck-cp2.jf.intel.com> <20140106232717.GA22336@kroah.com> <52CB41CA.8070508@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <52CB41CA.8070508@zytor.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/06/2014 03:52 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 01/06/2014 03:27 PM, Greg KH wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 03:16:24PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote: >>> This change restricts the check for the for the FSF address in the GPL >>> copyright statement so that it only flags the address, not the references to >>> the gnu.org/licenses URL which appear in numerous drivers. >>> >>> So for example this statement will still return an error: >>> You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License >>> along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software >>> Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA. >>> >>> However, this statement will not return an error after this patch: >>> You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License >>> along with this program. If not, see . >> >> Why is this paragraph needed? The kernel does come with a copy of the >> GPL, so it's not an issue for kernel files, right? >> > > (IANAL but...) Presumably some people might be concerned about it > because of either patches on mailing lists or otherwise separate from > the kernel, or if someone pulls individual files out of the kernel tree > for another project. > > -hpa > > The individual files issue the main concern. For our driver we have bits that are often copied out without the rest of the kernel. User space drivers are a perfect example. As a result we find a number of spots where our driver files are copied and there is no COPYING file. Thanks, Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/