Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754631AbaAGGcI (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jan 2014 01:32:08 -0500 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:7854 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752743AbaAGGcG (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jan 2014 01:32:06 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,617,1384272000"; d="scan'208";a="9383387" Message-ID: <52CB9FF8.6020809@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 14:34:32 +0800 From: Tang Chen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Rothwell CC: Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lans Zhang , Yasuaki Ishimatsu , Lai Jiangshan , Jiang Liu , Zhang Yanfei Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree References: <20140107170041.3a0b3ada016d250b1f9f0572@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20140107170041.3a0b3ada016d250b1f9f0572@canb.auug.org.au> X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on mailserver/fnst(Release 8.5.3|September 15, 2011) at 2014/01/07 14:31:01, Serialize by Router on mailserver/fnst(Release 8.5.3|September 15, 2011) at 2014/01/07 14:31:03, Serialize complete at 2014/01/07 14:31:03 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/07/2014 02:00 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in > arch/x86/mm/numa.c between commit f3d815cb854b ("x86/mm/numa: Fix 32-bit > kernel NUMA boot") from the tip tree and commit 1459be89954e ("x86: get > pg_data_t's memory from other node") from the akpm-current tree. > > These appear to be two very similar solutions, I fixed it up (see below - > I (arbitrarily) chose to keep the actual allocation from the tip tree, but > the messages from the akpm-current tree) and can carry the fix as > necessary (no action is required). > memblock_alloc_nid() and __memblock_alloc_base() will call memblock_alloc_base_nid() in the end. So I think it is OK to me. I will do some tests when they are merged. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/