Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755962AbaAHJlV (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jan 2014 04:41:21 -0500 Received: from cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com ([217.140.96.50]:43906 "EHLO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755582AbaAHJlQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jan 2014 04:41:16 -0500 Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 09:41:04 +0000 From: Mark Rutland To: Sachin Kamat Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "broonie@kernel.org" , "lee.jones@linaro.org" , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "lgirdwood@gmail.com" , "sameo@linux.intel.com" , "sbkim73@samsung.com" , "patches@linaro.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Documentation: mfd: Add binding document for S2MPA01 Message-ID: <20140108094104.GC6701@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1389162390-4582-1-git-send-email-sachin.kamat@linaro.org> <1389162390-4582-3-git-send-email-sachin.kamat@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1389162390-4582-3-git-send-email-sachin.kamat@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 06:26:30AM +0000, Sachin Kamat wrote: > Added initial binding documentation for S2MPA01 MFD. > > Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/s2mpa01.txt | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/s2mpa01.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/s2mpa01.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/s2mpa01.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..ae750a28821b > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/s2mpa01.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ > + > +* Samsung S2MPA01 Voltage and Current Regulator > + > +The Samsung S2MPA01 is a multi-function device which includes high > +efficiency buck converters including Dual-Phase buck converter, various LDOs, > +and an RTC. It is interfaced to the host controller using an I2C interface. > +Each sub-block is addressed by the host system using different I2C slave > +addresses. > + > +Required properties: > +- compatible: Should be "samsung,s2mpa01-pmic". > +- reg: Specifies the I2C slave address of the PMIC block. It should be 0x66. > + > +Optional properties: > +- interrupt-parent: Specifies the phandle of the interrupt controller to which > + the interrupts from s2mpa01 are delivered to. > +- interrupts: Interrupt specifiers for interrupt sources. That sounds a bit odd. How many interrupts might there be? What do they signal? > + > +Optional nodes: > +- regulators: The regulators of s2mpa01 that have to be instantiated should be > +included in a sub-node named 'regulators'. Regulator nodes included in this > +sub-node should be of the format as listed below. > + > + regulator_name { > + [standard regulator constraints....]; > + }; > + Why not just say that the regulators node contains regulators in the usual format, with reference to the regulator binding? > + regulator-ramp-delay for BUCKs = [6250/12500(default)/25000/50000] uV/us > + > + BUCK[1/2/3/4] supports disabling ramp delay on hardware, so explictly > + regulator-ramp-delay = <0> can be used for them to disable ramp delay. > + In the absence of the regulator-ramp-delay property, the default ramp > + delay will be used. > + > +NOTE: Some BUCKs share the ramp rate setting i.e. same ramp value will be set > +for a particular group of BUCKs. So provide same regulator-ramp-delay. > +Grouping of BUCKs sharing ramp rate setting is as follow : BUCK[1, 6], > +BUCK[2, 4], and BUCK[8, 9, 10] It would probably be better to have a heading like "Properties for BUCK regulator nodes" for all of the above. > + > +The regulator constraints inside the regulator nodes use the standard regulator > +bindings which are documented elsewhere. As mentioned above, state this at the beginning and point to the regulator bindings. > + > +The following are the names of the regulators that the s2mpa01 PMIC block > +supports. Note: The 'n' in LDOn and BUCKn represents the LDO or BUCK number > +as per the datasheet of s2mpa01. So these are what the nodes should be called? (rather than values for regulator-name). Otherwise this looks ok to me. Thanks, Mark. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/