Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 3 Feb 2001 15:28:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 3 Feb 2001 15:27:55 -0500 Received: from neon-gw.transmeta.com ([209.10.217.66]:24076 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 3 Feb 2001 15:27:49 -0500 Message-ID: <3A7C69AB.9C7603A8@transmeta.com> Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 12:27:23 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Organization: Transmeta Corporation X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0 i686) X-Accept-Language: en, sv, no, da, es, fr, ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Rohland CC: "J . A . Magallon" , "H . Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.1 In-Reply-To: <20010123205315.A4662@werewolf.able.es> <95csna$vb6$1@cesium.transmeta.com> <20010202215254.C2498@werewolf.able.es> <3A7B1EDC.DA2588BA@transmeta.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph Rohland wrote: > > "H. Peter Anvin" writes: > > > > Mmmmmm, does this mean that mounting /dev/shm is no more needed ? > > > One step more towards easy 2.2 <-> 2.4 switching... > > Yes, it is no longer needed. You will need for POSIX shm, but there > are not a lot of program out there using it. > Do you need it for POSIX shm or not... if so, I would say you do need it (even if it's going to take some time until POSIX shm becomes widely used.) -hpa -- at work, in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/