Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:35:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:35:00 -0500 Received: from smtp-out-4.wanadoo.fr ([193.252.19.23]:10115 "EHLO mel-rto4.wanadoo.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:34:59 -0500 From: christophe varoqui Organization: devoteam To: Alexander Viro Subject: Re: [RFC]partitions through device-mapper Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 20:41:10 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.7 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200210291941.10659.christophe.varoqui@free.fr> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 966 Lines: 23 > a) devmapper is merged, but it sure as hell is not mandatory > let me argue that if I decide to hand my system FS to the device-mapper I wouldn't want the current partition code to be mandatory either (devil's advocate speaking) > b) relying on the hotplug working right means living dangerously. Right > now that code is brittle in the best case. > > c) all existing races in overlapping attach/detach (and $DEITY witness, > there's a plenty) immediately become much wider [OK, that's part of > (b), actully] > > IOW, right now the thing is nowhere near being ready for such use. point taken. But, the question remains : do we want to get there in the end ? (question from the time-and-effort-worthy? departement) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/