Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751501AbaAILda (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jan 2014 06:33:30 -0500 Received: from gw-1.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.217]:60306 "EHLO pandora.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750882AbaAILdU (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jan 2014 06:33:20 -0500 Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 11:33:00 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Olof Johansson , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Fengguang Wu , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" , Patch Tracking , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 Resend] cpufreq: create cpufreq_generic_get() routine Message-ID: <20140109113300.GA27432@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 02:56:28PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Naah.. After some investigation I found this: > > - We already have dummy implementations of clk routines in case > CONFIG_HAVE_CLK is not defined (I added them long back). > > - There is one thing common among all above defconfigs, all > belong to SA1100 family :) > > - And the problem is: SA1100 wanted to define its own clk routines > and selects CLKDEV_LOOKUP (which enables HAVE_CLK), but it > doesn't implement all clk routines. Which is *wrong*. No, it implements only what it's clk API implementation requires. > @Russell: If above looks correct then can you please communicate > what should we do here? I don't really know what exactly these > routines should have, simply a copy of dummy routines from clk.h > or some meaningful stuff. So, maybe you can write a patch, otherwise > let me know what to write and I will give it a try. I've no idea at the moment, and I don't have time to look at this. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: 5.8Mbps down 500kbps up. Estimation in database were 13.1 to 19Mbit for a good line, about 7.5+ for a bad. Estimate before purchase was "up to 13.2Mbit". -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/