Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754911AbaAIOqD (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jan 2014 09:46:03 -0500 Received: from mail-oa0-f47.google.com ([209.85.219.47]:59798 "EHLO mail-oa0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751978AbaAIOp4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jan 2014 09:45:56 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1645387.93uAkEaqro@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1645387.93uAkEaqro@vostro.rjw.lan> Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 20:15:55 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 Resend] cpufreq: create cpufreq_generic_get() routine From: Viresh Kumar To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Olof Johansson , Russell King - ARM Linux , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Fengguang Wu , "linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" , Patch Tracking , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 9 January 2014 17:41, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Well, if build is broken, it *always* is the fault of the commit that > introduced the breakage, even if that is a result of someone else doing > things incorrectly. Why? Because it potentially breaks bisection for > people and *that* is a big deal. Agree :) > So yes, I'm going to revert it. Please resubmit after you've addressed the > build breakage. Will do that shortly. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/