Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751422AbaALMYK (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Jan 2014 07:24:10 -0500 Received: from smtp6-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.6]:58924 "EHLO smtp6-g21.free.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751394AbaALMX5 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Jan 2014 07:23:57 -0500 Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 13:23:21 +0100 From: Jean-Francois Moine To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Rob Clark , Dave Airlie , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 20/28] drm/i2c: tda998x: move the TBG_CNTRL_0 register setting Message-ID: <20140112132321.757f3fa7@armhf> In-Reply-To: <20140111183648.GH15937@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20140109120607.6a33bee5@armhf> <20140111183648.GH15937@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 18:36:48 +0000 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 12:06:07PM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: > > According to the comment, the TBG_CNTRL_0 register must be set at the > > end of the mode change sequence. > > So you believe comments without understanding the history, and you move > code around due to those. > > No, this is again wrong. That write to REG_TBG_CNTRL_0 in the sequence > writing the video information to the chip. This doesn't encompass the > HDMI/DVI mode setting nor the audio configuration - the audio configuration > can change independently of the video setting, and does not require this > register to be written. > > This also brings up a bug in one of your previous patches which I now > must go back and comment upon. Well, I have not the full spec of the TDA998x's, and I don't know what is important or not. I was hoping that Rob had a better knowledge than I. So, in my patch 9, I was writing the REG_TBG_CNTRL_1 after writing REG_TBG_CNTRL_0, and you refused it. Here, I write REG_TBG_CNTRL_0 after the write of REG_TBG_CNTRL_1 in the HDMI sequence, and you still don't agree. What is the right way? -- Ken ar c'hentaƱ | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! ** Jef | http://moinejf.free.fr/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/