Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751259AbaALREG (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Jan 2014 12:04:06 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:38233 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750899AbaALRED (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Jan 2014 12:04:03 -0500 Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 18:03:54 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Qiaowei Ren , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86, mpx: extend siginfo structure to include bound violation information Message-ID: <20140112170354.GC3655@pd.tnic> References: <1389518403-7715-1-git-send-email-qiaowei.ren@intel.com> <1389518403-7715-5-git-send-email-qiaowei.ren@intel.com> <20140112093013.GB3664@pd.tnic> <52D2C791.2030802@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52D2C791.2030802@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 08:49:21AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > I saw a previous version of the code that did that, and it really > didn't work out well -- it ended up being more complex and slower. I suspected as much. But, we still probably should use the generic struct insn, insn_field, etc and act on them in mpx.c instead of defining our own mpx_insn, mpx_insn_field, X86_MODRM_MOD, etc in the header which are more or less copied from insn.h, right? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/