Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 04:30:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 04:30:39 -0500 Received: from codepoet.org ([166.70.99.138]:30109 "EHLO winder.codepoet.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 04:30:22 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 02:36:44 -0700 From: Erik Andersen To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Miles Bader , Dave Cinege , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Abbott and Costello meet Crunch Time -- Penultimate 2.5 merge candidate list. Message-ID: <20021030093644.GA8423@codepoet.org> Reply-To: andersen@codepoet.org Mail-Followup-To: Erik Andersen , Jeff Garzik , Miles Bader , Dave Cinege , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200210272017.56147.landley@trommello.org> <200210300229.44865.dcinege@psychosis.com> <3DBF8CD5.1030306@pobox.com> <200210300322.17933.dcinege@psychosis.com> <20021030085149.GA7919@codepoet.org> <3DBFA0F8.9000408@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3DBFA0F8.9000408@pobox.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.19-rmk2, Rebel-NetWinder(Intel StrongARM 110 rev 3), 185.95 BogoMips X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1168 Lines: 28 On Wed Oct 30, 2002 at 04:06:00AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Miles Bader wrote: > >[Well, OK, actually it'd be nice to have something like initramfs + some > >other sort of fetch-the-bits-directly-from-ROM FS which I could > >mix-n-match; anyway initramfs has got to be better than initrd...] > > > > > > It should be pretty easy to populate initramfs from ROM... I imagine so. But that still leaves everything in RAM. On a system with just 1 or 2 MB of ram (I have run Linux on such things :-) there really isn't much point in trying to use any sortof ramfs. Its just not going to work. For that type of application you really want something like JFFS, JFFS2 and whatnot living in ROM/flash. But I'm sure someone could find a reason for a *ramfs to be useful, even then.... :) -Erik -- Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/ --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/