Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 05:18:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 05:18:31 -0500 Received: from c-66-176-164-150.se.client2.attbi.com ([66.176.164.150]:1693 "EHLO schizo.psychosis.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 05:18:31 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Dave Cinege Reply-To: dcinege@psychosis.com To: Miles Bader , Miles Bader Subject: Re: Abbott and Costello meet Crunch Time -- Penultimate 2.5 merge candidate list. Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 05:24:57 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.2 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200210272017.56147.landley@trommello.org> <200210300455.20883.dcinege@psychosis.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200210300524.57458.dcinege@psychosis.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 887 Lines: 25 On Wednesday 30 October 2002 4:59, Miles Bader wrote: > Dave Cinege writes: > > #2 My main bitch at jeff was he said if initramfs goes in > > initrd comes out. initrd shodul not come out. > > So what are the advantages of initrd over initramfs? Is it just > historical compatibility, or are is there more? I didn't intend to get into a crazy discussion like this now... After I release my patch later today, and people see how it works, then we can discuss this is a meaningful manner. Until then, I'll end further comments to this thread. Dave -- The time is now 22:48 (Totalitarian) - http://www.ccops.org/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/