Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751880AbaAMNfP (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jan 2014 08:35:15 -0500 Received: from mail-ie0-f176.google.com ([209.85.223.176]:56196 "EHLO mail-ie0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751550AbaAMNe6 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jan 2014 08:34:58 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs: don't update isize when NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMITTING in nfs_update_inode From: Trond Myklebust In-Reply-To: <1389599759-2711-1-git-send-email-shaobingqing@bwstor.com.cn> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 08:34:54 -0500 Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-Id: References: <1389599759-2711-1-git-send-email-shaobingqing@bwstor.com.cn> To: shaobingqing X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Jan 13, 2014, at 2:55, shaobingqing wrote: > When a file is in NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMITING status, its isize perhaps has not been > transferred to the metadate server. So the isize getting from the metadata server > perhaps is out of date and cannot be used to update the isize of the client. > > Signed-off-by: shaobingqing > --- > fs/nfs/inode.c | 3 ++- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/nfs/inode.c b/fs/nfs/inode.c > index ebeb94c..caf50a1 100644 > --- a/fs/nfs/inode.c > +++ b/fs/nfs/inode.c > @@ -1402,7 +1402,8 @@ static int nfs_update_inode(struct inode *inode, struct nfs_fattr *fattr) > if (new_isize != cur_isize) { > /* Do we perhaps have any outstanding writes, or has > * the file grown beyond our last write? */ > - if ((nfsi->npages == 0 && !test_bit(NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMIT, &nfsi->flags)) || > + if ((nfsi->npages == 0 && !test_bit(NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMIT, &nfsi->flags) && > + !test_bit(NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMITTING, &nfsi->flags)) || > new_isize > cur_isize) { > i_size_write(inode, new_isize); > invalid |= NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR|NFS_INO_INVALID_DATA; Ugh. Is there any reason why we can?t just keep NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMIT set until the layout commit operation is finished instead of multiplying the tests for it in generic NFS code paths such as nfs_update_inode? -- Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/