Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752111AbaAMTC2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:02:28 -0500 Received: from mail-ee0-f45.google.com ([74.125.83.45]:63042 "EHLO mail-ee0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751596AbaAMTC0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:02:26 -0500 Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:02:21 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Josef Bacik , Chris Mason Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rwsem: add rwsem_is_contended Message-ID: <20140113190221.GA9667@gmail.com> References: <1389633531-1921-1-git-send-email-jbacik@fb.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1389633531-1921-1-git-send-email-jbacik@fb.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Josef Bacik wrote: > From: Josef Bacik > > Btrfs needs a simple way to know if it needs to let go of it's read lock on a > rwsem. Introduce rwsem_is_contended to check to see if there are any waiters on > this rwsem currently. This is just a hueristic, it is meant to be light and not > 100% accurate and called by somebody already holding on to the rwsem in either > read or write. Thanks, > > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik > --- > include/linux/rwsem.h | 11 +++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/rwsem.h b/include/linux/rwsem.h > index 0616ffe..03f3b05 100644 > --- a/include/linux/rwsem.h > +++ b/include/linux/rwsem.h > @@ -75,6 +75,17 @@ do { \ > } while (0) > > /* > + * This is the same regardless of which rwsem implementation that is being used. > + * It is just a heuristic meant to be called by somebody alreadying holding the > + * rwsem to see if somebody from an incompatible type is wanting access to the > + * lock. > + */ > +static inline int rwsem_is_contended(struct rw_semaphore *sem) > +{ > + return !list_empty(&sem->wait_list); > +} > + > +/* > * lock for reading > */ > extern void down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem); Looks good to me. To make it easier to merge 2/2 feel free to add this to the BTRFS tree, with my Acked-by: Acked-by: Ingo Molnar Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/