Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752787AbaAMTp7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:45:59 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:59196 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752071AbaAMTpv (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:45:51 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Scott Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH] Driver/IFC: Move Freescale IFC driver to a common driver Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:45:43 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.8.0-22-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Prabhakar Kushwaha , gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1389590671-20289-1-git-send-email-prabhakar@freescale.com> <201401131432.36880.arnd@arndb.de> <1389638849.24905.51.camel@snotra.buserror.net> In-Reply-To: <1389638849.24905.51.camel@snotra.buserror.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201401132045.44063.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:EBSxVvXYw7wj4wnO8iLuDWSr4A3Mt2lMZHr2mUjgwkT xEPYdJCVarjocXrpUlg4UGs8L37co5HvKienfJ9P3UxyoBitkC OpE8boCEvyiCQKfaM/XalIIM6nc6HxICpjvGYO9lK2srd4lbyZ tiYJUTQZqN3NnjDSk1TvKkJjhwLPoKCo9d3qju/+tDHxSBsjXL KNasTYGTYVPUJL29yVenhV38yA7jLvhSFnYKBb/kWZloso0DoZ mCkvG0LE8VslxUEOPcDZaXJuxYGRGNESaq3LB/+6JHWHaS6+YL lbFLrn9thv01OG5AFaG3lZ6yVVUxfNTLow9XN5thE1vxLa5dzT MWfBXLj1K2QVEK0vR9NM= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 13 January 2014, Scott Wood wrote: > On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 14:32 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Monday 13 January 2014, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote: > > > Freescale IFC controller has been used for mpc8xxx. It will be used > > > for ARM-based SoC as well. This patch moves the driver to driver/misc > > > and fix the header file includes. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha > > > > No objections to the driver, but drivers/misc doesn't seem like the > > right place. Why not drivers/mfd or drivers/memory? > > It's not a memory controller in the sense that I think most people would > interpret the phrase, but I guess it's similar in function to > mvebu-devbus. If drivers/memory is broad enough to cover such things, > and doesn't have a memory controller subsystem that drivers are supposed > to register with, then that could work. > > Are things in drivers/mfd expected to interact with mfd-core.c? It's > not clear to me what that does or how it would be useful to the IFC > code. Sorry, I meant mtd not mfd. mtd would make sense if the only devices behind it are things like flash or sram memory. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/